The Truth Of Early Man
February 10, 2014 Leave a comment
[This study goes into early man and early spirituality. It contains commentary and videos. Below the videos are links to source articles. This is published to both ReverendDrRed.com and SpiritualMessiahMinistries.org. This study is the property of Spiritual Messiah Ministries™ / Rev. Dr. Red Ministries™. Other sources utilized within are used under the Fair Use Agreement. We recommend bookmarking this study as it will take many hours to get through the commentary and attached videos, let alone visiting our sources. By bookmarking this study, you can complete your review as you have time.
To those who are unfamiliar with our ministry, we are attempting to correct heresy that has plagued our faith for centuries. Therefore, any and all Biblical references are done so with the root-form understanding, not that of modern mainstream fallacy.]
People are debating over new found species of man around the globe. Did they coexist? Are dates fudged? Were these early men intelligent or dumb? What is the truth of this situation. We have taken an interest in this debate since it also plays into the more spiritual side of things. Spiritual Messiah Ministries was created to do what very few ministries in the past and present have attempted. And that is to get to the Truth. As Jesus stated “The Truth Shall Set You Free” and “Seek And Ye Shall Find”. All aspects of life are connected to Spirituality. Everything is inter-connected. Where there is debate, we will attempt to get to the answer with all information that is provided.
Let us begin:
Races or Species
To start, people suggest that there were many species of man. Completely seperate from one another and allegedly evolved into one another. This is flawed for several reasons.
All “archaic” man coexisted at the same time. This is proven by various methods of dating. It is believed they could not interbreed since they were different species, however our very own DNA suggests otherwise. As it stands today, there are five races within modern man known as Homo Sapien. These races are as follows:
1) Mongoloid (Asian and American
Indian)
2) Caucasoid (European)
3) Australoid (Australian and oceanic)
4) Negroid (east African black)
5) Capoid (south African black)
The different races can be determined by their skeletal structure, particularly the skulls. If five different skull structures can coexist within one species, than why is archaic man said to be of different species of man solely based on skull and skeletal structure? Would it not be safe to assume that the archaic men were simply other races of man that became genetically absorbed into todays remaining five races? It has also been said that in our distant future, all races will be absorbed into one another creating one race with one skull and skeletal structure.
Tim White of the University of California said that members of the same species could have differently shaped skulls. He told Associated Press it was the equivalent of looking at a female Olympic gymnast and a male shot-putter and deciding they had to come from different species.
Acts 17:26 KJV
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation
Origin Of Man
There is also debate over whether or not all man came out of Africa at seperate times, travelled back and forth, or several races originating in multiple locations.
There were several races of man that show no signs of going to or coming from Africa. One such race is Neandertal. Neandertal, previously thought to be ape-like but recently proven to be rather human and intelligent, spanned across Europe, Siberia, and into East China. Aboriginal Sub-Saharan Africans have no trace of Neandertal DNA, whereas every other people has a range from 1%-5% Neandertal DNA. This suggests that they did not go into Africa nor come from man from Africa. Or at the very least didn’t mate with these peoples while mating with every other peoples. It was only in more modern recorded history that an outside race mated with the Sub-Saharan Africans. This, however, is a subject that needs further research as they have found “unknown” DNA in these peoples and it is believed there is an archeological coverup in this area.
Another area of a documented archeological coverup, as spoken about in the ‘Forbidden Archeology’ video below, is the fact that man has been in the Americas for well over 400,000yrs. Far longer than the 10-15,000yrs previously thought. There are also cover-ups of digs all across United States that put the Caucasoid (European) in America well before the Mongoloid (American Indian).
The Bible also has much to say on this topic:
To possibly help the situation where you have man originating in and out of Africa, lets take a look at a largely over-looked two creations.
Genesis 1:10-11, 20-21, 24, 26-28 KJV
And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
In this version we see creation of man made in Gods image, given the entire planet and dominion thereof. If this was one creation of man, then what is the other? Lets take a look.
Genesis 2:5, 7-8, 10-15, 18-22 KJV
And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads. The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold; And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone. And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates. And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him. And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
In this second creation, we find man created before (not after) the other creatures of the Earth. This man was also confined to a particular mass of land.
Could these two creations explain why most races of archaic man mated with one another, except for those of the Sub-Saharan?
The Bible also tells of a natural disaster, and how man survived. Lets see where man ended up after this disaster:
Genesis 9:1-3, 7, 18-19 KJV
And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein. And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan. These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.
Genesis 10:1-8, 10-11, 13-32 KJV
Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah. And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations. And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan. And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtecha: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan. And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah, And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim, And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim. And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth, And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite, And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad. And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha. These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations. Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born. The children of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram. And the children of Aram; Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Mash. And Arphaxad begat Salah; and Salah begat Eber. And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan. And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah, And Hadoram, and Uzal, and Diklah, And Obal, and Abimael, and Sheba, And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab: all these were the sons of Joktan. And their dwelling was from Mesha, as thou goest unto Sephar a mount of the east. These are the sons of Shem, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, after their nations. These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.
This perfectly describes the locations where Neandertal is known to have been. Taking a close look at the nations of where the descendants of Noah became, Noahs family contained the elements of each individual race of man we know today. And perhaps races of man yet to be discovered.
Science now seems to be backing the Bible in the fact that we all come from God and originate in several locales across the planet. Let us also remember that the continents used to be joined together as one large land mass, which would explain how man could have been on many continents as early as 400,000 years ago. The idea man stayed confined to one particular area for such a long period of time is illogical.
Culture And Spirituality
The Neandertal, which as shown above may very well be Noah’s descendants, were not as dumb-witted as many believe. Signs now show they had very complex societies. Considering the Neandertal experienced many Ice Ages and hardships would explain why their average age was only 30yrs. The Ice Age conditions would also explain why their numbers are said to be few and the jump seen in cultural advancement began only after the climate began to warm, which would have made more resources hidden beneath snow and ice readily available. It would also bring about larger plains for animals to migrate to these once cold climates, and animals already there to reproduce in larger numbers.
The Neandertal handcrafted tools out of stone using a method of knapping that is extremely difficult and requires extreme precision. A glue was also created to bind tools together using a method that archeologists have yet to successfully duplicate. They designed tools for various different tasks, and presumably taught these methods to each younger generation. They also created jewelry from animal bone and stones. Signs of body painting are also apparent. In a few locations there are drawings of animals on cave walls. The Neandertal also buried there dead, which shows a sense of caring for loved ones. Some areas even suggest Neandertal had burial grounds with pre-determined burial plots for their dead.
Signs exist of a possible between Eastern and Western European Neandertal culture and tool-making, with possible trade or commerce taking place between the two Neandertal cultures in Central Europe.
In recent research, the Neandertal is said to be spiritually inclined as well. Evidence of this is documented in the ‘Carpathian Sphynx’ video linked below. Neandertal society is said to have worshipped goddesses. It is also believed they had belief in immortality in the sense that when one dies the spirit goes to another existance. Similar to an afterlife.
Neandertal is also said to be musically inclined. They had a larynx similar to modern man, except they may have been able to produce louder sounds than we can. A flute made from a bear bone was also found amongst Neandertal remains.
We also have the sudden appearance of Cro-Magnon with far advanced tools. These include bone and antler tools, such as spear tips (the first) and harpoons. They also used animal traps. and bow and arrow. They invented shafts and handles for their knives, securing their blades with bitumen, a kind of tar, as long as 40 thousand years ago. Other improvements included the invention of the atlatl, a large bone or piece of wood with a hooked groove used for adding distance and speed to spears. They also invented more sophisticated spear points, such as those that detach after striking and cause greater damage to prey.
Cro-Magnon also buried their dead and show signs of spirituality. It is believed they also worshipped gods and goddesses.
Cro-Magnon’s appearance with a “ready made” culture from an “unknown” location, their “superhuman” more robust bodies than modern man, and their sudden disappearance is being debated, explained away, and ignored by archeologists. In attempts to fit Cro-Magnon into the ‘Out of Africa’ theory, they try to fit Cro-Magnon into the same category as less robust, less intelligent Sub-Saharan Africans. In so doing, they are only creating a theory largely full of holes. Some, such as the Theosophists, believe the Cro-Magnon came from Atlantis. Therefore suggesting that Cro-Magnon’s evidence of cultural evolution and physical adaptation cannot be found because it is buried beneath the Atlantic Ocean.
Regardless of where Cro-Magnon originated, the idea they came out of Africa does these people a serious disservice. Cro-Magnon, like Neandertal, show signs of an intelligent, spiritually inclined society. It is also believed Cro-Magnon used body paints as well, were clean shaven, and wore sewn clothes.
Evolution Theory Mis-haps
A major problem exists for the evolution theory. Neandertal is now proven to be more intelligent than previously thought, Cro-Magnon is being attempted to be clumped in with less intelligent and less robust peoples, and two “species” of man are now being said to be races of an ape known as Australopithecus.
In reference to Homo Rudolfensis:
The evolutionary paleoanthropologist J. E. Cronin states the following on the matter:
… its relatively robustly constructed face, flattish naso-alveolar clivus, (recalling australopithecine dished faces), low maximum cranial width (on the temporals), strong canine juga and large molars (as indicated by remaining roots) are all relatively primitive traits which ally the specimen with members of the taxon A. africanus.
C. Loring Brace from Michigan University came to the same conclusion. As a result of the analyses he conducted on the jaw and tooth structure of skull 1470, he reported that “from the size of the palate and the expansion of the area allotted to molar roots, it would appear that ER 1470 retained a fully Australopithecus -sized face and dentition.”
Professor Alan Walker, a paleoanthropologist from Johns Hopkins University who has done as much research on KNM-ER 1470 as Leakey, maintains that this creature should not be classified as a member of Homo-i.e., as a human species-but rather should be placed in the Australopithecus genus.
In reference to Homo Habilis:
The detailed analyses conducted by American anthropologist Holly Smith in 1994 indicated that Homo habilis was not Homo, in other words, human, at all, but rather unequivocally an ape. Speaking of the analyses she made on the teeth of Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis, Smith stated the following:
Restricting analysis of fossils to specimens satisfying these criteria, patterns of dental development of gracile australopithecines and Homo Habilis remain classified with African apes. Those of Homo erectus and Neanderthals are classified with humans.
Within the same year, Fred Spoor, Bernard Wood and Frans Zonneveld, all specialists on anatomy, reached a similar conclusion through a totally different method. This method was based on the comparative analysis of the semicircular canals in the inner ear of humans and apes, which allow them to maintain their balance. Spoor, Wood and Zonneveld concluded that:
Among the fossil hominids the earliest species to demonstrate the modern human morphology is Homo erectus. In contrast, the semi-circular canal dimensions in crania from southern Africa attributed to Australopithecus and Paranthropus resemble those of the extant great apes. Spoor, Wood and Zonneveld also studied a Homo habilis specimen, namely Stw 53, and found out that “Stw 53 relied less on bipedal behavior than the australopithecines.” This meant that the H. habilis specimen was even more ape-like than the Australopithecus species. Thus they concluded that “Stw 53 represents an unlikely intermediate between the morphologies seen in the australopithecines and H. erectus.”
Another problem is that evolution theory, which suggests we came from apes, now cannot rely on a “missing link” theory. The Sahelanthropus tchadensis is said to be more human-like than the Australopithecus. Why is this a problem for evolutionists? The Australopithecus is said to be 5 million years old, whereas the Sahelanthropus tchadensis is said to be 7 million years old. So not only was Homo Sapien walking the Earth the same time as Neandertal, Cro-Magnon, and Denisovan; but you also have a human-like creature 2 million years older than the ape evolutionists suggest we evolved from.
The comments of Henry Gee, the senior editor of Nature and a leading paleoanthropologist, about the 2002 discovered ape fossil are very noteworthy. In his article published in The Guardian , Gee refers to the debate about the fossil and writes:
Whatever the outcome, the skull shows, once and for all, that the old idea of a ‘missing link’ is bunk… It should now be quite plain that the very idea of the missing link, always shaky, is now completely untenable.
Conclusion
Evolution theory doesn’t have a leg to stand on. Science now shows that various races of man, once believed to “evolve” into the next, all lived among each other. Two species once believed to be earliest man, dating back 5 million years, are now proven to be apes. Another race of man was discovered to be 7 million years old. So even if the 5 million year old apes were man, there would still exist man 2 million years older. In that respect, either way it’s looked at, it shoots holes in the theory of evolution.
Despite popular belief that early man was primitive and dumb, it has been proven that all early man were intelligent, developed a form of religion, and had complex cultures.
There is also a complex cover-up attempting to hide how and when early man came to the Americas. Archeologists and others are attempting to uncover and spread the truth, inso doing risking their careers. In time the truth will be out and evolution theory may finally be put to rest.
The Bible is a clear historical reference to man, the various cultures, races, and spirituality of man. The key is to read the Bible with an open-mind to see what is being said. Too many people, Christian and non-Christian alike, read the Bible with bias and pre-supposition.
2 Corinthians 13:8 KJV
For we can do nothing against the truth, but for the truth.
Matthew 7:7 KJV
Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:
John 8:32 KJV
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
Galatians 4:16 KJV
Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?
Proverbs 8:7 KJV
For my mouth shall speak truth; and wickedness is an abomination to my lips.
Psalms 33:4 KJV
For the word of the Lord is right; and all his works are done in truth.
This study will be updated or a Part 2 will follow as newer information becomes available. If you come across any information relevant to this subject, please email it to RevDrRedMinistries@gmail.com.
Enjoy the videos.
Videos:
The Carpathian Sphynx
If the video does not show or play Click Here
Decoding The Neanderthal
If the video does not show or play Click Here
Forbidden Archeology: Suppressed New Evidence Of Early Man
If video does not show or play Click Here
Source Articles (The articles are seperated into category. Our source articles come from both creationists and evolutionists. We do not guarantee that each link will work, as websites do delete posts and/or shutdown. If you come across a broken link, please email the info to SpiritualMessiahMinistries@gmail.com and we will attempt to find a duplicate of the article.)
Different Variations Of Man
1. The Truth About Neanderthal DNA by Creation Moments
2. Neanderthal Myth And Orwellian Double-Think
3. Study Suggests Neanderthals Were More Advanced
4. Neandertal Genome Like Ours
5. Flashback! I Saw A Neanderthal Man Driving A Tram
6. Neanderthal And Heidelberg Distinction Blur
7. Neandertals Mixed With Humans In China
8. Neandertals – Same As Modern Man?
9. Denisovan Hominins Interbred With An Unknown Early Human Species, New DNA Analysis Shows
10. The Case Of The Missing Human Ancestor
11. Genome of Mysterious Extinct
Human Reveals Brown-Eyed Girl
12. Denisovans: Mysterious Homo Species Interbred with Modern Humans in Australasia
13. Mystery Human Species Emerges From Denisovan Genome
14. Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa
16. Homo floresiensis Distinct Human Species, Says New Research
17. Sumerian gypsum statues or…Neanderthal man and woman?
18. Oddball ‘Skull 5’ Fossil Suggests Early Humans Belonged To Same Species
19. Blow to multiple human species idea
22. Early Evolution Of Man: Homo Erectus And Ergaster
23.New Flat-Faced Human Species Possibly Discovered
24. Human race will ‘split into two different species’
25. New Species Of Human Prompts Debate Over Mankinds Evolution
26. Pre -Adamic man: Were there human beings on Earth before Adam?
27. Evolution Of Modern Humans
30. The Secret History Of Homo Sapiens
31. Origin Of Man
32. Misconception Of Homo Rudolfensis
33. Homo Habilis
34. Latest Evidence: Sahelanthropus tchadensis and The Missing Link That Never Was
Culture And Spirituality
1. Homo neanderthalensis – The Neanderthals
3. Neanderthal Culture: Old Masters
4. Handaxe design reveals distinct Neanderthal cultures
5. Neanderthal Tools Reveal Cultural Differences
6. The Sudden Appearance Of Cro-Magnon
7. Archaic Homo sapiens, Homo heidelbergensis and Cro-Magnon Man
8. Neanderthals: Their Anatomy And Culture
10. Cro-Magnon Man From Atlantis
If studies such as this interest you, and you would like to partake in future studies with us, email RevDrRedMinistries@gmail.com with your Name, Location, and Area Of Interest.
Spiritual Messiah Ministries 